Quantcast
 

Something Tells Me Multi-Grain Doughnuts Still Won't Be Healthy

Thu, 06/28/2007 - 6:22am by YumSugar
4,048 Views - 16 comments

Remember when I told you guys about Krispy Kreme's foray into whole wheat doughnuts? Some of you thought it was great, while others thought it was a dumb marketing ploy. Well, a few months later, they've got a new doughnut for you to weigh in on. This time it's a multigrain cake doughnut made with seven grains and topped with an oatmeal crisp crunch. For now it's just a limited time treat (starting July 9) made with molasses and brown sugar with a slight pecan flavor to it. Sure, seven grains sounds healthy, but last I heard, a doughnut is still a doughnut.

Source: PR Newswire


Related Yum Stories

Related Network Stories


 
 
 

16 Comments Add a Comment

  • rbex's picture
    rbex
    1

    Agreed! There's no way that all that sugar is healthy for anyone. And 7 grains? Probably includes all enriched ones.

    1 year 27 weeks ago Report Comment
  • fairy_MK's picture
    fairy_MK
    2

    I think it is all a marketing ploy as well. I don't care what kind of ingredients (milti-grain, 7 grains, organic ingredients, all natural ingredients), if you deep fry it there is still 0 health content left. It's like deep frying tofu. Defeats the point of it being healthy. But then again so do other "health" items. Baked Lays? Sure they are healthIER, but if you eat the whole bag, it defeats the purpose. Eye-wink

    1 year 27 weeks ago Report Comment
  • LaLaLaurie06's picture
    LaLaLaurie06
    3

    Will they be giving away free samples? I'd rather taste it first before purchasing...

    1 year 27 weeks ago Report Comment
  • tshellyedwards's picture
    tshellyedwards
    4

    Okay -- so, come on, ladies, let's get real. For me, if I'm going to have a doughnut, I'm going to have a DOUGHNUT. That means fat, sugar, delicious-ness and all. And I will have one, and I will enjoy every bite Smiling

    I tried those whole wheat original glazed when they first came out, and they are NOT good. What's the point of having a doughnut? I totally wasn't satisfied, and all I wanted to do was a buy another (which, I did, by the way Smiling) to really meet the desire to have a doughnut. Might as well just get the real thing, allow myself a treat for that day and enjoy it to the fullest Smiling

    And rbex, you're probably right. Is this new doughnut actually made with 100% whole grains, or enriched??

    Enough said on my part Smiling

    1 year 27 weeks ago Report Comment
  • GeorgiaCharlotte's picture
    GeorgiaCharlotte
    5

    I don't think any of this whole wheat or baked stuff makes anything healthier, but rather less unhealthy. It still depends on the exact ingredient list (yes, they use grains and molasses, but do they also include corn syrup and enriched flour?), but as long as they aren't consumed every day, I think a once in a while deep fried whole wheat doughnut as a treat is better than a regular doughnut.

    1 year 27 weeks ago Report Comment
  • rbex's picture
    rbex
    6

    Also, eating a "healthier" version may cause people to think that eating more than one is OK to do.

    I'm with tshelly, if I'm going to indulge in a doughnut, I'm going to probably go with the real thing. It's like icecream - I would much rather eat the real thing occasionally as a treat than have the fat fat sugar free (a.k.a frankenfood) kind.

    1 year 27 weeks ago Report Comment
  • pinkdragonfly's picture
    pinkdragonfly
    9

    According to the Krispy Kreme website, the whole wheat doughnut and original doughnut have similar calorie and fat content (180 cal and 11 g fat for ww, 200 cal and 12 g fat for original) so if the whole wheat doesn't taste good I would definitely go for the real thing!

    1 year 27 weeks ago Report Comment
  • fairy_MK's picture
    fairy_MK
    10

    I agree. Calling something healthy makes people think that they can eat more of it and be ok. It's like diet soda. People will order the mcheart-attack burger, large fries and diet coke. Well why not, you're saving on the soda calories right?

    If you are going to splurge, you might as well do it in small doses. Like someone stated, if you are going to have a donut have ONE. You crave it for a reason, i.e. flavor. So eat what you like. If you want to eat at mc donald's and have a burger and some fries, get a kids meal!

    What drives me wild is the fast food restaurants advertising salads as being healthy. If you actually look at the nutrition charts, sure your salad may only be 180 calories. But that is NOT including the crutons, salad dressing, the CHEESE, etc.

    I say eat what you like, but in moderation and smaller portions. Nothing wrong with eating unhealthy items. We all do, and you can still not screw up your "diet" or healthy mind-set.

    1 year 27 weeks ago Report Comment
  • UrbanBohemian's picture
    UrbanBohemian
    13

    I think when companies try to make an indulgent snack healthy, it usually fails. Which is why the best choice would be the original. Chances are it won't be as bad as the 'healthier' option.

    1 year 27 weeks ago Report Comment
  • Ginger's picture
    Ginger
    14

    People don't eat whole grain to reduce calories or fat. It has other benefits, like fiber.

    While this isn't healthy, the calorie, fat and sugar content are less than a regular cafe latte from Starbucks.

    1 year 27 weeks ago Report Comment
  • rbex's picture
    rbex
    15

    Maybe true Ginger, but these aren't really "whole grain". =/

    I'm not surprised about the latte stats. That's with whole milk and loads of sugar.

    1 year 27 weeks ago Report Comment
  • JessBear's picture
    JessBear
    16

    I think it actually sounds pretty good. The description makes me think it must be reminiscent of a muffin- one of those delic, 1,000 calorie, cakey muffins.

    1 year 27 weeks ago Report Comment

Leave a Comment

To post comments, please log in or register.



Morsels of goodness, delivered daily.

Enter your email below:
 
 
 
Recipes: Add | Browse | Search
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 











©1976-2009 Sugar Inc. | Privacy (updated July-4-2008) | Terms of Use | Copyright Policy | Advertise | Contact Us